Catalogue > Serials > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2018

Pages: 2877-2896

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Adam Carter, "Meta-epistemic defeat", Synthese 195 (7), 2018, pp. 2877-2896.

Abstract

An account of meta-epistemic defeaters—distinct from traditional (first-order) epistemic defeaters—is motivated and defended, drawing from case studies involving epistemic error-theory (e.g., Olson 2011, Reasons for belief; cf., Streumer 2012, J Philos 110:1–25) and epistemic relativism (e.g., MacFarlane 2005, Oxford Stud Epistemol 1:197–233; 2011; 2014, Assessment sensitivity: Relative truth and its applications). Mechanisms of traditional epistemic defeat and meta-epistemic defeat are compared and contrasted, and some new puzzles are introduced.

Publication details

Year: 2018

Pages: 2877-2896

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Adam Carter, "Meta-epistemic defeat", Synthese 195 (7), 2018, pp. 2877-2896.