Catalogue > Serials > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2008

Pages: 45-60

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Daniel Guevara, "Rebutting formally valid counterexamples to the Humean "is-ought" dictum", Synthese 164 (1), 2008, pp. 45-60.

Rebutting formally valid counterexamples to the Humean "is-ought" dictum

Daniel Guevara

pp. 45-60

in: Synthese 164 (1), 2008.

Abstract

Various formally valid counterexamples have been adduced against the Humean dictum that one cannot derive an “ought” from an “is.” There are formal rebuttals—some very sophisticated now (e.g., Charles R. Pigden’s and Gerhard Schurz’s)—to such counterexamples. But what follows is an intuitive and informal argument against them. I maintain that it is better than these sophisticated formal defenses of the Humean dictum and that it also helps us see why it implausible to think that we can be as decisive about the truth or falsity of the dictum as both the formal counterexamples or formal barriers to them purport to be.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 2008

Pages: 45-60

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Daniel Guevara, "Rebutting formally valid counterexamples to the Humean "is-ought" dictum", Synthese 164 (1), 2008, pp. 45-60.