![](/public/assets/img/publi/_default/cover.jpg)
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2009
Pages: 173-194
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349283019
Full citation:
, "Simply the best", in: Knowing the structure of nature, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009
![](/public/assets/img/bookmark.png)
![](/public/assets/img/rights/COPR.png)
Simply the best
a case for abduction
pp. 173-194
in: , Knowing the structure of nature, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009Abstract
In this chapter I will do two things. First, I shall formulate what I think is the basic problem of any attempt to characterise the abstract structure of scientific method, namely, that it has to satisfy two conflicting desiderata: it should be ampliative (content-increasing) and it should confer epistemic warrant on its outcomes (cf. Gower 1998; Psillos 1999). Second, and after I have examined two extreme solutions to the problem of the method, namely, Enumerative Induction (EI) and the Method of Hypothesis, I will try to show that abduction, suitably understood as inference to the best explanation (IBE), offers the best description of scientific method and solves the foregoing problem in the best way: it strikes the best balance between ampliation and epistemic warrant.
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2009
Pages: 173-194
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349283019
Full citation:
, "Simply the best", in: Knowing the structure of nature, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009