
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2016
Pages: 213-217
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349566426
Full citation:
, "Memory is no longer what it used to be", in: Memory in the twenty-first century, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016


Memory is no longer what it used to be
pp. 213-217
in: Sebastian Groes (ed), Memory in the twenty-first century, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016Abstract
In Difference and Repetition, Gilles Deleuze develops a philosophy of time that allows three different conceptualizations of memory: memory conceived from the present, memory from the past and memory from the future.1 According to Deleuze, in any human being there is always an interplay between these different ways of conceiving memory and time more generally. On a more collective cultural level, however, I propose that we have moved into new dominant way of understanding memory: In the twenty-first century we increasingly conceive memory from the point of view of possible futures. In contemporary cinema, as well as elsewhere in culture, memory is no longer what it used to be.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2016
Pages: 213-217
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349566426
Full citation:
, "Memory is no longer what it used to be", in: Memory in the twenty-first century, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016