Conclusions

Jean Wahl

pp. 215-218

in: Steven Bland, Epistemic relativism and scepticism, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018

Abstract

This chapter delineates the limits of the dialectical argument against epistemic relativism. In particular, the argument is not a response to Pyrrhonian scepticism, nor is it a response to the underdetermination and semantic arguments for epistemic relativism. If it succeeds only in undermining the principal argument for epistemic relativism, then it will have done its job.