data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2017
Pages: 787-807
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "The case for mind perception", Synthese 194 (3), 2017, pp. 787-807.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
The case for mind perception
pp. 787-807
in: Nivedita Gangopadhyay (ed), The future of social cognition, Synthese 194 (3), 2017.Abstract
The question of how we actually arrive at our knowledge of others’ mental lives is lively debated, and some philosophers defend the idea that mentality is sometimes accessible to perception. In this paper, a distinction is introduced between “mind awareness” and “mental state awareness,” and it is argued that the former at least sometimes belongs to perceptual, rather than cognitive, processing.
Publication details
Year: 2017
Pages: 787-807
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "The case for mind perception", Synthese 194 (3), 2017, pp. 787-807.