Catalogue > Serials > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2014

Pages: 2147-2165

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Stephan Kramer, "Implicit commitment in theory choice", Synthese 191 (10), 2014, pp. 2147-2165.

Implicit commitment in theory choice

Stephan Kramer

pp. 2147-2165

in: Synthese 191 (10), 2014.

Abstract

The proper evaluation of a theory’s virtues seems to require taking into account what the theory is indirectly or implicitly committed to, in addition to what it explicitly says. Most extant proposals for criteria of theory choice in the literature spell out the relevant notion of implicit commitment via some notion of entailment. I show that such criteria behave implausibly in application to theories that differ over matters of entailment. A recent defence by Howard Peacock of such a criterion against this objection is examined and rejected. I go on to a develop a better proposal on which, roughly speaking, a theory is counted committed to a claim if and only if its best fully explicit extension is explicitly committed to the claim. Such extensions in turn are evaluated by ordinary standards of theory choice adapted to the case of theories assumed to articulate their intended content in a fully explicit fashion.

Publication details

Year: 2014

Pages: 2147-2165

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Stephan Kramer, "Implicit commitment in theory choice", Synthese 191 (10), 2014, pp. 2147-2165.