data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2012
Pages: 309-321
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "On reflective knowledge", Synthese 188 (2), 2012, pp. 309-321.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
On reflective knowledge
replies to Battaly and Reed
pp. 309-321
in: Claudio de Almeida, Stephen Hetherington (eds), Topics in contemporary epistemology, Synthese 188 (2), 2012.Abstract
This article is a reply to Baron Reed and Heather Battaly, two critics in a book symposium on my Reflective Knowledge. The reply to Reed concerns the main content and structure of Descartes’s epistemology. The reply to Battaly concerns how best to deal with epistemic circularity.
Cited authors
Publication details
Year: 2012
Pages: 309-321
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "On reflective knowledge", Synthese 188 (2), 2012, pp. 309-321.