data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2011
Pages: 115-126
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "Future development of scientific structures closer to experiments", Synthese 183 (1), 2011, pp. 115-126.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
Future development of scientific structures closer to experiments
response to F. A. Muller
pp. 115-126
in: Arianna Betti, Willem de Jong, Marije Martijn (eds), The classical model of science II, Synthese 183 (1), 2011.Abstract
First of all, I agree with much of what F.A. Muller (Synthese, this issue, 2009) says in his article ‘Reflections on the revolution in Stanford’. And where I differ, the difference is on the decision of what direction of further development represents the best choice for the philosophy of science. I list my remarks as a sequence of topics.
Publication details
Year: 2011
Pages: 115-126
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "Future development of scientific structures closer to experiments", Synthese 183 (1), 2011, pp. 115-126.