Catalogue > Serials > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 1994

Pages: 273-289

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Steven D. Hales, "Self-deception and belief attribution", Synthese 101 (2), 1994, pp. 273-289.

Self-deception and belief attribution

Steven D. Hales

pp. 273-289

in: Synthese 101 (2), 1994.

Abstract

One of the most common views about self-deception ascribes contradictory beliefs to the self-deceiver. In this paper it is argued that this view (the contradiction strategy) is inconsistent with plausible common-sense principles of belief attribution. Other dubious assumptions made by contradiction strategists are also examined. It is concluded that the contradiction strategy is an inadequate account of self-deception. Two other well-known views — those of Robert Audi and Alfred Mele — are investigated and found wanting. A new theory of self-deception relying on an extension of Mark Johnston's subintentional mental tropisms is proposed and defended.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 1994

Pages: 273-289

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Steven D. Hales, "Self-deception and belief attribution", Synthese 101 (2), 1994, pp. 273-289.