data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69dbf/69dbf33d19b2ece4cb0652cf898b66177afa8342" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: sdvig press
Year: 2015
Pages: 63-112
Series: Metodo
Full citation:
, "Expression diacritique et sémiogenèse", Metodo 3 (1), 2015, pp. 63-112.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e208/4e20873ea0f44329f5e4c22be80263532eb870c3" alt=""
Expression diacritique et sémiogenèse
pp. 63-112
in: Antonino Bondi, Francesco La Mantia (eds), Phenomenology and semiotics, Metodo 3 (1), 2015.Abstract
This paper deals with the problem of semiogenesis in the light of Saussure’s and Merleau-Ponty’s approaches. Semiogenesis here stands for the emergence of differentiated moments of expression taking form in the semiotic flow through various boundaries and polarities (Signifier/Signified), therefore going far beyond the usual lexico-grammatical picture. Grounded on the Generalized Diacritical Turn of the Merleau-pontian phenomenology, we suggest to set up a critical examination, as well as a few proposals, of : the gestural approach of speech, the negativity of the linguistic identity in Saussurian theory, the paradoxical status of the notion of value, the horizon of a system as a secondary effect of the ‘parole parlante’, meaning seen first as the unfolding of a figural field induced by an essentially ‘incomplete’ linguistic apparatus. The paper ends up with a set of questions and presumed limitations left by this Merleau-pontian diacritical frame.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: sdvig press
Year: 2015
Pages: 63-112
Series: Metodo
Full citation:
, "Expression diacritique et sémiogenèse", Metodo 3 (1), 2015, pp. 63-112.