data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2011
Pages: 489-494
Series: Human Studies
Full citation:
, "D. Ivison (ed): The Ashgate research companion to multiculturalism" Human Studies 34 (4), 2011, pp. 489-494
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
D. Ivison (ed): The Ashgate research companion to multiculturalism
Equality in difference, hierarchical multiculturalism and membership illusions
pp. 489-494
in: Human Studies 34 (4), 2011.Abstract
In his introduction to the Ashgate Research Companion to Multiculturalism, Ivison makes very clear that while multiculturalism (MC) or the “accommodation of cultural differences” concerns itself with the autonomy and freedom of groups, it especially focuses on individuals if individual ‘freedoms’ are curtailed by group cultural expectations. This perspective, however, reveals a bias toward only accommodating diversity that is compatible with the liberal ends of individual freedom and autonomy (“as well as thinking of ways of liberalizing currently illiberal practices”) (p. 10) as defined by the cultural (usually western) majority. Any societal subculture or “group that violates their members’ basic liberties, or prevents them from exercising their autonomy are not entitled to multicultural accommodation or protection” (p. 11). To be entitled to accommodation, groups need to respect individuals’ basic rights and offer “informed and effective choices” (p. 15) under the protection of...
Publication details
Year: 2011
Pages: 489-494
Series: Human Studies
Full citation:
, "D. Ivison (ed): The Ashgate research companion to multiculturalism" Human Studies 34 (4), 2011, pp. 489-494