
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2010
Pages: 333-346
Series: Axiomathes
Full citation:
, "Are proper names rigid designators?", Axiomathes 20, 2010, pp. 333-346.


Are proper names rigid designators?
pp. 333-346
in: Essays on non-empiricist rigorous philosophy, Axiomathes 20, 2010.Abstract
A widely accepted thesis in the philosophy of language is that natural language proper names are rigid designators, and that they are so de jure, or as a matter of the "semantic rules of the language." This paper questions this claim, arguing that rigidity cannot be plausibly construed as a property of name types and that the alternative, rigidity construed as a property of tokens, means that they cannot be considered rigid de jure; rigidity in this case must be viewed as a pragmatic and not a semantic property.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2010
Pages: 333-346
Series: Axiomathes
Full citation:
, "Are proper names rigid designators?", Axiomathes 20, 2010, pp. 333-346.