
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2006
Pages: 387-423
Series: Axiomathes
Full citation:
, "Beyond Descartes", Axiomathes 16 (4), 2006, pp. 387-423.
Abstract
For some two millennia, Western civilization has predominantly viewed mind and consciousness as the private domain of the human species. Some have been willing to extend these qualities to certain animals. And there has been a small but very significant minority of philosophers who have argued that the processes of mind are universal in extent, and resident in all material things – the concept of panpsychism. The traditional "man-alone', or "man-and-higher-animals', views of mind have come under increasing criticism of late, and their philosophical weaknesses seem increasingly insurmountable. This has caused some thinkers to reexamine the ancient and venerable concept of panpsychism, and to apply it anew in contemporary theories of mind. The present essay reintroduces panpsychism, and demonstrates something of its legacy in Western thought.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2006
Pages: 387-423
Series: Axiomathes
Full citation:
, "Beyond Descartes", Axiomathes 16 (4), 2006, pp. 387-423.