Catalogue > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2009

Pages: 361-375

ISBN (Hardback): 9783540938019

Full citation:

Armando Rocha, Fernando Gomide, Witold Pedrycz, "What we are learning from neurosciences about decision-making", in: Views on fuzzy sets and systems from different perspectives, Berlin, Springer, 2009

What we are learning from neurosciences about decision-making

a quest for fuzzy set technology

Armando Rocha

Fernando Gomide

Witold Pedrycz

pp. 361-375

in: Rudolf Seising (ed), Views on fuzzy sets and systems from different perspectives, Berlin, Springer, 2009

Abstract

Classic decision theory asserts that decision makers should choose the option that offers the highest expected value. Daniel Bernoulli [24] (Trepel, Fox and Poldrack, 2005) suggested that people do not evaluate options by their objective value but rather by their utility and conjectured that appropriate choices are those for which the expected utility is maximum. Bernoulli also argued that utility functions should to be a concave function because he assumed that the marginal utility decreases as the assets increases.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2009

Pages: 361-375

ISBN (Hardback): 9783540938019

Full citation:

Armando Rocha, Fernando Gomide, Witold Pedrycz, "What we are learning from neurosciences about decision-making", in: Views on fuzzy sets and systems from different perspectives, Berlin, Springer, 2009