data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2010
Pages: 283-303
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048191147
Full citation:
, "Is naturalism the unsurpassable philosophy for the sciences of man in the 21st century?", in: The present situation in the philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
Is naturalism the unsurpassable philosophy for the sciences of man in the 21st century?
pp. 283-303
in: Friedrich Stadler (ed), The present situation in the philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 2010Abstract
Jean-Paul Sartre famously wrote, nearly 50 years ago, that Marxism "remains the philosophy of our time. We cannot go beyond it." In his critic Raymond Aron's words, Marxism was for Sartre the "insurpassable [or, in other translations: unsuperable] philosophy of our time.1" Taken in context, Sartre's pronouncement was at once descriptive and prescriptive: it was, according to him, neither objectively possible for the philosopher to leave the confines of Marxism, nor ethically permissible to attempt to do so.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2010
Pages: 283-303
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048191147
Full citation:
, "Is naturalism the unsurpassable philosophy for the sciences of man in the 21st century?", in: The present situation in the philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 2010