data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2017
Pages: 399-416
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9783319576688
Full citation:
, "Worker bees and slave labor", in: Encouraging openness, Berlin, Springer, 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
Worker bees and slave labor
pp. 399-416
in: Nimrod Bar Am, Stefano Gattei (eds), Encouraging openness, Berlin, Springer, 2017Abstract
Work connotes activity, effecting or bringing something about. The worker does something physically and/or mentally, and whatever is "worked" has been acted upon. Work is a denial of passivity, and thus a manifestation of force or power. Indeed, the association of work with force sometimes invites a further conjunction between work and violence. John Locke, for example, identifies labor with 'subduing" the earth, and thereby rationalizes private property: "The Law Man was under, was rather for appropriating. God Commanded, and his [man's] Wants forced him to labor. And hence subduing or cultivating the Earth, and having Dominion, we see, are joined together. The one gave Title to the other. So that God, by commanding to subdue, gave Authority so far to appropriate. And the Condition of Human Life, which requires Labor and Materials to work on, necessarily introduces private possessions."
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2017
Pages: 399-416
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9783319576688
Full citation:
, "Worker bees and slave labor", in: Encouraging openness, Berlin, Springer, 2017