Catalogue > Serials > Book Series > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1999

Pages: 50-75

Series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy

ISBN (Hardback): 9783642084706

Full citation:

Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew, "Does the second law of thermodynamics refute the neo-darwinian synthesis?", in: Sociobiology and bioeconomics, Berlin, Springer, 1999

Does the second law of thermodynamics refute the neo-darwinian synthesis?

Bruce H. Weber

David J. Depew

pp. 50-75

in: Peter Koslowski (ed), Sociobiology and bioeconomics, Berlin, Springer, 1999

Abstract

Ever since Darwin, there has been a troubled but changing relationship between two great achievements of nineteenth century science, thermodynam­ics and Darwinian evolutionary theory. The second law of thermodynamics, particularly in its Boltzmannian statistical formulation, predicts that as en­tropy increases to a maximum, so will disorder. Eventually, energy differ­ences in the universe will disappear, so that no more work will be possible. Darwin's theory, by contrast, implies the possibility that biological systems can, though not necessarily, increase in ordered complexity over time through the action of natural selection. The increase in heterogeneity that is a hall­mark of life does not seem to follow the arrow of time that points toward the heat death of the universe.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1999

Pages: 50-75

Series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy

ISBN (Hardback): 9783642084706

Full citation:

Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew, "Does the second law of thermodynamics refute the neo-darwinian synthesis?", in: Sociobiology and bioeconomics, Berlin, Springer, 1999