Catalogue > Serials > Book Series > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2020

Pages: 355-380

Series: Contributions to Phenomenology

ISBN (Hardback): 9783030293567

Full citation:

David M. Peña-Guzmán, "Not phenomenology's "other"", in: The subject(s) of phenomenology, Berlin, Springer, 2020

Not phenomenology's "other"

historical epistemology's critique and expansion of phenomenology

David M. Peña-Guzmán

pp. 355-380

in: Iulian Apostolescu (ed), The subject(s) of phenomenology, Berlin, Springer, 2020

Abstract

While there are important tensions between French historical epistemology and classical phenomenology as modes of thought, fixation on these differences has obstructed recognition of their similarities. Using the writings of Jean Cavaillès and Gaston Bachelard as case studies, this chapter shows that historical epistemology may be read as simultaneously critiquing and expanding the phenomenological project originated by Husserl in the early twentieth century. The author rebuffs the widespread conception that historical epistemology is phenomenology's "Other" and calls for further research on their historical and philosophical relationships.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2020

Pages: 355-380

Series: Contributions to Phenomenology

ISBN (Hardback): 9783030293567

Full citation:

David M. Peña-Guzmán, "Not phenomenology's "other"", in: The subject(s) of phenomenology, Berlin, Springer, 2020