data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/304f8/304f8befd5830a56d33d036ed7de640fa917b697" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2020
Pages: 355-380
Series: Contributions to Phenomenology
ISBN (Hardback): 9783030293567
Full citation:
, "Not phenomenology's "other"", in: The subject(s) of phenomenology, Berlin, Springer, 2020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
Not phenomenology's "other"
historical epistemology's critique and expansion of phenomenology
pp. 355-380
in: Iulian Apostolescu (ed), The subject(s) of phenomenology, Berlin, Springer, 2020Abstract
While there are important tensions between French historical epistemology and classical phenomenology as modes of thought, fixation on these differences has obstructed recognition of their similarities. Using the writings of Jean Cavaillès and Gaston Bachelard as case studies, this chapter shows that historical epistemology may be read as simultaneously critiquing and expanding the phenomenological project originated by Husserl in the early twentieth century. The author rebuffs the widespread conception that historical epistemology is phenomenology's "Other" and calls for further research on their historical and philosophical relationships.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2020
Pages: 355-380
Series: Contributions to Phenomenology
ISBN (Hardback): 9783030293567
Full citation:
, "Not phenomenology's "other"", in: The subject(s) of phenomenology, Berlin, Springer, 2020