Catalogue > Serials > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2016

Pages: 565-589

Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

Full citation:

Manuel Heras-Escribano, Manuel de Pinedo, "Are affordances normative?", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 15 (4), 2016, pp. 565-589.

Abstract

In this paper we explore in what sense we can claim that affordances, the objects of perception for ecological psychology, are related to normativity. First, we offer an account of normativity and provide some examples of how it is understood in the specialized literature. Affordances, we claim, lack correctness criteria and, hence, the possibility of error is not among their necessary conditions. For this reason we will oppose Chemero's (2009) normative theory of affordances. Finally, we will show that there is a way in which taking advantage of affordances could be considered as possessing a normative character, but only when they are evaluated within the framework of social normative standards in particular situations. This reinforces our claim that affordances, per se, lack normativity and can only be taken to be rule-governed in relation to established normative practices.

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2016

Pages: 565-589

Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

Full citation:

Manuel Heras-Escribano, Manuel de Pinedo, "Are affordances normative?", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 15 (4), 2016, pp. 565-589.