Catalogue > Serials > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2004

Pages: 259-280

Series: Human Studies

Full citation:

Robert Piercey, "Ricoeur's account of tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas debate", Human Studies 27 (3), 2004, pp. 259-280.

Ricoeur's account of tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas debate

Robert Piercey

pp. 259-280

in: Human Studies 27 (3), 2004.

Abstract

While it is clear that the Gadamer–Habermas debate has had a major influence on Paul Ricoeur, his commentators have had little to say about the nature of this influence. I try to remedy this silence by showing that Ricoeur's account of tradition is a direct response to the Gadamer–Habermas debate. First, I briefly explain the debate's importance and describe Ricoeur's reaction to it. Next, I show how his discussion of tradition in Time and Narrative steers a middle course between Gadamerian hermeneutics and Habermasian Ideologiekritik. Finally, I raise some critical questions about the adequacy of Ricoeur's middle course. Specifically, I argue that it rests on an implausible distinction between the form and the content of tradition.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 2004

Pages: 259-280

Series: Human Studies

Full citation:

Robert Piercey, "Ricoeur's account of tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas debate", Human Studies 27 (3), 2004, pp. 259-280.