data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2004
Pages: 259-280
Series: Human Studies
Full citation:
, "Ricoeur's account of tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas debate", Human Studies 27 (3), 2004, pp. 259-280.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
Ricoeur's account of tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas debate
pp. 259-280
in: Human Studies 27 (3), 2004.Abstract
While it is clear that the Gadamer–Habermas debate has had a major influence on Paul Ricoeur, his commentators have had little to say about the nature of this influence. I try to remedy this silence by showing that Ricoeur's account of tradition is a direct response to the Gadamer–Habermas debate. First, I briefly explain the debate's importance and describe Ricoeur's reaction to it. Next, I show how his discussion of tradition in Time and Narrative steers a middle course between Gadamerian hermeneutics and Habermasian Ideologiekritik. Finally, I raise some critical questions about the adequacy of Ricoeur's middle course. Specifically, I argue that it rests on an implausible distinction between the form and the content of tradition.
Cited authors
Publication details
Year: 2004
Pages: 259-280
Series: Human Studies
Full citation:
, "Ricoeur's account of tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas debate", Human Studies 27 (3), 2004, pp. 259-280.