data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18916/18916de460f56b0a126b4afd4bfffe6a710a0ad9" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2010
Pages: 173-188
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048191147
Full citation:
, "How special are the life sciences?", in: The present situation in the philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
How special are the life sciences?
a view from the natural kinds debate
pp. 173-188
in: Friedrich Stadler (ed), The present situation in the philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 2010Abstract
Philosophers of the special sciences seem to find it important to ask whether or not particular groupings of things that feature in particular special sciences can be conceived of as natural kinds.1 For example, a quick search of the philosophical literature of the past decades comes up with several dozens of papers targeting the question "Is … a natural kind?", many of these concerning kinds of emotions and the emotion category in psychology2 and the category of concepts in psychology / cognitive science.3
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2010
Pages: 173-188
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048191147
Full citation:
, "How special are the life sciences?", in: The present situation in the philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 2010