data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c70ab/c70ab767d3eb41327537000db469aeb6388d239f" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2019
Pages: 185-197
Series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9783030257996
Full citation:
, "On the arising of the I in Peirce and Husserl", in: Peirce and Husserl, Berlin, Springer, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065056aa5eb3b2545dd806cbd182cf9b00781d18" alt=""
On the arising of the I in Peirce and Husserl
pp. 185-197
in: Mohammad Shafiei, Pietarinen (eds), Peirce and Husserl, Berlin, Springer, 2019Abstract
In this chapter 1 discuss how the ego arises within the lived experiences of the concrete human being by comparing Husserl's and Peirce's notions of the constitution of the "I". This chapter consists of a comparative examination of Husserl's genetic phenomenology and Peirce's category of secondness. It compares Husserl's notion of awakening of the ego with Peirce's psychological notion of ego reaction. In contrast to Spiegelberg, Philos Phenomenol Res,17(2):164–185, (1956: 170) claim according to which the "Heraclitean" picture of Peirce's system is a "major obstacle to a full-scale comparison between the two phenomenologies", I try to show that it is precisely this Heraclitean image of the soul that makes Peirce and Husserl's systems, after all, so surprisingly similar.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2019
Pages: 185-197
Series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9783030257996
Full citation:
, "On the arising of the I in Peirce and Husserl", in: Peirce and Husserl, Berlin, Springer, 2019