data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5efd/b5efda4cdd33a4341b284d01ba3c115a55a6b410" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: sdvig press
Year: 2018
Pages: 99-117
Series: Acta Structuralica
Full citation:
, "Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze, readers of Saussure", Acta Structuralica 2, 2018, pp. 99-117.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dffa/7dffab55ad3ab890f71554f5c8367df17f466b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07809/078097919e1730ede9764c8f3ccc3f95ed941b55" alt=""
Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze, readers of Saussure
pp. 99-117
in: Beata Stawarska, Patrick R. Flack (eds), Merleau-Ponty and structuralism, Acta Structuralica 2, 2018.Abstract
In this article, I discuss the structuralist dimension in the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Gilles Deleuze. Their common interest in and reference to Ferdinand de Saussure’s linguistics is one of the arguments in favor of a continuity between these philosophies that are all too often considered antipodes. I argue that both Merleau-Ponty’s and Deleuze’s interests in Saussurean linguistics evolve around the latter’s immanent and differential conception of linguistic structures. Moreover, there is also a resonance between both authors’ criticism of Saussure and structuralism. However, it cannot be denied that, in comparison with Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze’s criticism of structuralism is more fierce, especially from the moment he starts collaborating with Guattari. I claim that Deleuze and Guattari were able to think through to the end the problem Merleau-Ponty already detected in Saussurean linguistics. While Merleau-Ponty made a beginning in solving Saussure’s problem, Deleuze and Guattari developed the theoretical tools to finish this attempt.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: sdvig press
Year: 2018
Pages: 99-117
Series: Acta Structuralica
Full citation:
, "Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze, readers of Saussure", Acta Structuralica 2, 2018, pp. 99-117.